Analysis reveals socioeconomic status affects health literacy in chronic disease, suggesting the need for targeted preventive healthcare strategies.
Purpose To explore the social determinants and underlying mechanisms of health literacy in managing chronic diseases, and to analyze how socioeconomic status (SES) influences it. Method This study, based on Shandong Province’s 2022 Health Literacy Surveillance Database, selected 2,826 residents from some, counties in Shandong eligible areas using multistage stratified cluster random sampling. It explored the social determinants of chronic disease health literacy using multiple linear regression, multiple logistic regression, interactive analysis and mediation analysis. Results Higher SES (High vs. Low: OR = 2.21, 95%CI: 1.68–2.91, P < 0.001; Medium vs. Low: OR = 1.36, 95%CI: 1.08–1.71, P = 0.009), elevated household income (Highest vs. Lowest category: OR = 2.58, 95%CI: 1.58–4.22, P < 0.001), and higher educational attainment (Bachelor’s vs. Primary: OR = 3.46, 95%CI: 2.06–5.81, P < 0.001) were positively associated with higher chronic disease literacy. However, patients specifically diagnosed with hypertension (OR = 2.27, 95%CI: 1.35–3.79), coronary heart disease (OR = 2.57, 95%CI: 1.14–5.81), or diabetes (OR = 2.37, 95%CI: 1.21–4.63) demonstrated significantly higher literacy levels. The preventive healthcare services (indirect effect = 0.017, 95% CI: 0.016–0.041, P < 0.001), changes in health behavior (indirect effect = 0.007, 95% CI: 0.002–0.020, P < 0.001), and frequency of physical examinations (indirect effect = 0.006, 95% CI: 0.004–0.015, P < 0.001) significantly mediated the relationship between SES and chronic disease literacy. Subgroup analysis showed that in the low SES group, women (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.50–0.75, P < 0.001) and elders (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.42–0.91, P = 0.001) had significantly lower chronic disease literacy than men and young participants. Conclusion This study elucidates the multidimensional mechanisms by which SES impacts chronic disease health literacy and provides a scientific basis for developing targeted interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: