Retrospective analysis shows septic shock incidence at 1.06% in viral pneumonia, suggesting risks from specific pathogens like RSV may inform treatment.
Background This study aimed to determine the incidence of septic shock in hospitalized children with viral pneumonia, identify high-risk viral pathogens, and compare the clinical features between viral- and bacterial-associated septic shock cases. Methods A retrospective study on viral respiratory infections in children hospitalized with pneumonia at two hospitals between 2022 and 2024 was conducted, with logistic regression used to assess the pathogen-specific risks. Results Among 5,956 children with viral pneumonia, the incidence of septic shock was 1.06%, varying significantly by pathogen ( p < 0.001). Influenza A (FluA) showed the highest incidence (3.70%) and was the strongest predictor of shock [odds ratio (OR) = 7.506], followed by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) (2.24%; OR = 4.559). Compared to bacterial shock cases ( n = 46), viral shock cases showed higher respiratory failure/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) rates (88.9% vs. 52.2%, p < 0.001) but they had shorter hospital stays (17.3 vs. 24.2 days, p = 0.026). FluA cases were more likely to have less infant involvement ( p = 0.023), more neurologic compromise (35.7% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.040), and develop refractory shock (42.9% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.007) compared to bacterial cases. RSV showed higher respiratory failure (75.9% vs. 52.2%, p = 0.040) and lower coagulopathy (34.5% vs. 60.9%, p = 0.026) rates. Conclusions FluA and RSV are the key viral pathogens that predispose pediatric pneumonia patients to septic shock. Rapid viral polymerase chain reaction testing enables early pathogen identification, facilitating antibiotic de-escalation when bacterial coinfection is unlikely and promoting precise, safe antimicrobial stewardship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: