Why the study?
The role of virus detection on disease severity among children presenting to the emergency department with suspected community-acquired pneumonia needed evaluation.
Does viral detection predict increased disease severity in children with suspected community-acquired pneumonia?
Does viral detection predict increased disease severity in children with suspected community-acquired pneumonia?
Detection of respiratory viruses, particularly RSV and rhinovirus, is associated with increased disease severity in children presenting with suspected community-acquired pneumonia, independent of biomarkers and radiographic findings.
Viral detection may signal higher severity risk in pediatric suspected CAP; leaves open whether routine testing should guide ED decisions.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of virus detection on disease severity among children presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: We performed a single-center prospective study of children presenting to a pediatric ED with signs and symptoms of a lower respiratory tract infection and who had a chest radiograph performed for suspected CAP. We included patients who had virus testing, with results classified as negative for virus, human rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza, and other viruses. We evaluated the association between virus detection and disease severity using a 4-tiered measure of disease severity based on clinical outcomes, ranging from mild ( discharged from the ED) to severe (receipt of positive-pressure ventilation, vasopressors, thoracostomy tube placement, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, intensive care unit admission, diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock, or death) in models adjusted for age, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, radiologist interpretation of the chest radiograph, presence of wheeze, fever, and provision of antibiotics. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-three patients were enrolled in the parent study, of whom viruses were detected in 344 (60%), including 159 (28%) human rhinovirus, 114 (20%) RSV, and 34 (6%) with influenza. In multivariable models, viral infections were associated with increasing disease severity, with the greatest effect noted with RSV (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-4.81) followed by rhinovirus (aOR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.27-3.76). Viral detection was not associated with increased severity among patients with radiographic pneumonia (n = 223; OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 0.87-3.87) but was associated with severity among patients without radiographic pneumonia (n = 141; OR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.40-4.59). CONCLUSIONS: The detection of a virus in the nasopharynx was associated with more severe disease compared with no virus; this finding persisted after adjustment for age, biomarkers, and radiographic findings. Viral testing may assist with risk stratification of patients with lower respiratory tract infections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramgopal et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: