Cross-sectional study shows gender differences in vitamin D and calcium's effects on bone health, implying targeted nutritional interventions may be beneficial.
Bone health, assessed by bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD), is a critical determinant of overall health and quality of life. Vitamin D and calcium are well-established factors influencing bone metabolism, but their effects may differ by gender and remain insufficiently clarified. This study aimed to examine the associations of vitamin D levels and total calcium concentrations with BMC and BMD, with a focus on gender-specific effects. Based on health data gathered from 2011 to 2018, this cross-sectional study included 11,246 participants aged ≥18 years. The study variables included BMC, BMD, 25-hydroxyvitamin D 2 + D 3 [25(OH)D 2 + D 3 ], 25(OH)D 2 , 25(OH)D 3 , and total calcium levels, with adjustments for covariates such as smoking, alcohol consumption, and body mass index. The associations of vitamin D and calcium with BMC and BMD were evaluated using multivariate linear regression, followed by gender-specific subgroup analyses. The results of this study disclosed that both vitamin D levels and total calcium concentrations were significantly associated with BMC and BMD ( P < .05). Subgroup analysis revealed that, in males, vitamin D levels – including 25(OH)D 2 + D 3 , 25(OH)D 2 , and 25(OH)D 3 – were positively associated with BMC and BMD, while total calcium showed no significant effect. In contrast, among females, vitamin D levels were not significantly associated with BMC or BMD, whereas total calcium levels showed significant associations with both ( P < .05). Both vitamin D and calcium are essential for bone health maintenance, and their effects differ significantly between genders. Vitamin D levels have a stronger impact on bone health in males, while calcium intake is more influential in females. This observation may inform gender-specific nutritional interventions and offers theoretical support for personalized health approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: