Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis reveals thinning impacts on basal area prediction in Chinese fir plantations, indicating model choice is crucial for accurate forecasting.
Introduction Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) plantations are a major timber resource in subtropical China, where thinning strongly affects stand growth and yield forecasting. Reliable models are needed to balance short-term post-thinning responsiveness with long-term path consistency. This study compares two stand-level systems—Compatible and Annual (periodic-annual) Growth models—to evaluate their performance across thinning regimes and forecast horizons. Methods Data were derived from a 40-year thinning trial in southern China. Stand survival and basal area were modeled for thinned and unthinned stands using two model classes: (i) a Compatible system ensuring algebraic path consistency and (ii) an Annual system emphasizing short-interval responsiveness. Each was fitted with two data structures: consecutive (non-overlapping) and all possible (overlapping) growth pairs. Parameters were estimated using Seemingly Unrelated Regressions (SUR) and validated through threefold cross-validation for short (2–4 yr), medium (6–8 yr), and long (≥10 yr) horizons. Results In unthinned stands, Annual models with all growth pairs achieved the best short-term accuracy, while Compatible models performed best at medium and long horizons. In thinned stands, Annual models most accurately captured short-term survival, whereas Compatible models yielded superior basal area predictions at short to medium horizons. All-pairs estimation generally improved precision, though consecutive pairs reduced bias in short-term post-thinning basal area. Discussion Model behavior revealed a trade-off between responsiveness and path consistency. Annual systems are advantageous immediately after thinning, while Compatible systems provide stable long-term projections. For management of C. lanceolata plantations, we recommend Annual + All-pairs for short-term forecasting and Compatible + All-pairs for medium-to-long horizons, with recalibration every 6–8 years to maintain predictive reliability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: