Cross-sectional study reveals sex-related differences in TMD severity, jaw function, and oral health-related quality of life, suggesting more tailored care is needed.
Background Although females comprise the majority of patients with temporomandibular disorders ( TMDs ), few studies have prioritised the influence of sex on symptom severity and impact. Objectives This cross‐sectional study investigated sex‐related differences in TMD symptom severity, jaw functional limitation ( JFL ) and oral health‐related quality of life ( OHRQoL ); examined their interrelationships by sex; and identified symptom‐specific factors linked to high JFL and low OHRQoL . Methods Consecutively enrolled patients completed a survey including demographics, the Four‐Dimensional Six TMD symptoms ( 6Ts ‐ 4D ) screener, JFL Scale‐8 ( JFLS ‐8) and Oral Health Impact Profile for TMDs ( OHIP ‐ TMD ). TMD diagnostic subtypes were subsequently determined according to the DC / TMD protocol. Data were evaluated using chi‐square, non‐parametric tests and logistic regression ( α = 0.05). Results Among 280 participants (mean age 31.2 years [ SD 11.8]), 79.3% were female. Females showed significantly higher rates of combined pain‐related and intra‐articular TMDs , more TMD symptoms, more severe headaches, greater JFL and poorer overall OHRQoL than males. They also demonstrated stronger correlations between global TMD severity and OHRQoL dimensions ( r s = 0.38–0.66), as well as between JFL and OHRQoL ( r s = 0.48–0.79). Multivariate analysis revealed that high JFL was significantly associated with jaw muscle pain ( OR 1.22), jaw joint pain ( OR 1.21), TMJ closed‐lock ( OR 1.24) and open‐lock ( OR 1.25), while low OHRQoL was related to jaw muscle pain ( OR 1.16), jaw joint pain ( OR 1.24), headache ( OR 1.23) and TMJ closed‐lock ( OR 1.13). Conclusions Findings support sex‐informed TMD care, though generalizability is constrained by study design and sample composition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yap et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: