This study demonstrates improved predictive ability for feed efficiency in boars using deep learning, indicating non-additive genetic effects matter.
Pork is the most widely consumed meat globally, and the industry has achieved substantial genetic advancements for several traits using genomic selection. However, traditional linear genomic prediction models may be inadequate for predicting complex traits, such as feed efficiency, as they primarily capture additive genetic effects and overlook non-additive effects, including dominance and epistasis. Deep learning (DL) has the potential to address this limitation due to its ability to model non-linear patterns inherent in genomic data. The objectives of this study were to compare the predictive ability of DL models to the linear models for predicting feed efficiency (FE) trait in two boar populations, estimate the non-additive genetic variance captured by DL, and assess its effect on predictive ability. Our results showed that the DL models using the averaged-prediction method had the highest predictive ability in the sire line test population (0.381 for MLP and 0.377 for CNN), compared to 0.366 for linear models. DL models also showed higher abilities in the dam line test population, with MLP achieving a predictive ability of 0.364. Additionally, we showed that DL models captured non-additive variance; however, this did not significantly improve predictive ability. In conclusion, DL models, particularly MLP, demonstrated the highest predictive ability for FE, improving performance by approximately 4.1% for the sire line and 2.8% for the dam line compared to the traditional linear models. Therefore, DL models are recommended for predicting phenotypes and for estimating total genetic effects, including non-additive components. However, this comes at a significant increase of computational cost.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Onabanjo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: