Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
November 13, 2025The Egyptian Journal of OtolaryngologyOpen Access

How consistent are artificial intelligence responses with cochlear implant guidelines?

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

AKAysun Parlak KocabayÖİÖzlem İçöz

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Evaluation shows artificial intelligence responses moderately align with expert consensus on cochlear implant surgery, suggesting areas for improvement.

Key Points

  • To evaluate the accuracy of ChatGPT-4 responses in the context of cochlear implant surgery intraoperative testing.
  • Presented key questions from the International Consensus on Intraoperative CI Testing to GPT-4 twice.
  • Two independent reviewers rated similarity of responses as high, medium, or low.
  • Discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer.
  • 54.2% of responses rated highly similar to expert consensus.
  • Response reproducibility was 79.2%.
  • Inter-reviewer agreement had a κ value of 0.86.

Cite This Study

Kocabay et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/692523b2c0ce034ddc35469ahttps://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-025-00951-y
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluating the Accuracy and Completeness of Artificial Intelligence Responses Against Established Otology Guidelines2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2Enhancing Postoperative Cochlear Implant Care With ChatGPT-4: A Study on Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Patient Education and Support2024 · 31 citations
  3. 3Artificial intelligence as a clinical tool? Comparing ChatGPT to expert opinions in tinnitus2026
  4. 4Evaluating ChatGPT-4’s performance as a digital health advisor for otosclerosis surgery2024 · 22 citations
  5. 5The potential of ChatGPT as an artificial intelligence enhancement therapy consultant for patients with breast cancer2026