Cross-sectional survey highlights TXA administration practices and barriers among plastic surgeons worldwide, indicating variability.
Tranexamic acid (TXA) has gained widespread use across surgical disciplines due to its antifibrinolytic properties and favorable safety profile, yet standardized protocols for its use in aesthetic plastic surgery remain lacking. This study aimed to assess international trends, perceptions, and practices regarding TXA administration among board-certified plastic surgeons. A cross-sectional, anonymous survey was distributed electronically to all active members of The Aesthetic Society. The survey captured demographics, procedural usage, routes of administration, and perceived benefits or barriers associated with TXA. A total of 256 surgeons responded, with 69% reporting active use of TXA. Geographic variability was notable: usage was highest in Australia (100%) and Canada (92%) and lowest in South America and Asia (67%). Intravenous administration was the most common (36%), followed by topical (20%), tumescent (14%), and oral (3%); 27% reported case-dependent variation. TXA was most frequently used in facelifts (79%) and abdominoplasty (54%). Among non-users, 45.6% cited lack of robust data as the main deterrent. Most surgeons believed TXA reduced blood loss (93%), improved surgical field visibility (81%), and minimized ecchymosis (85%) and edema (85%), with 70% noting faster recovery. Importantly, 98% reported no thrombotic events in their practice. This is the first large-scale international survey assessing TXA use in aesthetic plastic surgery. Findings highlight variability in practice patterns and underscore the need for evidence-based guidelines to promote safe and consistent TXA usage across aesthetic procedures worldwide.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mirsky et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: