Observational cohort study finds proteomic changes in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid indicate pulmonary function and lung injury after transplantation.
Introduction Freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is a key objective after lung transplantation, yet predicting its onset remains challenging. This study investigated whether early proteomic changes in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) can differentiate between patients maintaining stable graft function at 36 months and those developing CLAD within the first year. Additionally, findings were compared to proteomic data from non-transplanted individuals. Methods BALF samples were collected at one month (1M) and twelve months (12M) post-transplant from 43 lung transplant recipients together with clinical parameters. Proteomic analysis was performed using mass spectrometry with label-free quantification for global protein profiling and heavy-labelled peptides for absolute quantification of mucins and related proteins. Differentially expressed proteins were identified and analysed through pathway enrichment to explore biological mechanisms associated with CLAD. Results No significant proteomic differences were detected at 1M. By 12M, 63 proteins were differentially expressed between patients who developed early CLAD and those with stable function. Mucin levels declined in stable patients but remained elevated in both groups compared to healthy controls. Cartilage acidic protein 1 was significantly higher in stable patients at twelve months and correlated with better pulmonary function. Pathway analysis linked several altered proteins in CLAD patients to networks associated with lung injury and remodelling. Conclusion Protein profiles in BALF that resemble those of healthy lungs are associated with sustained graft function, while persistent expression of lung injury markers is associated with early CLAD. This suggests an adaptive process is needed for long-term post-transplant success.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arike et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: