Assessment using a semantic-aware hierarchical network restores visual realism in damaged images, highlighting structural coherence and texture fidelity.
As a fundamental low-level vision task, image restoration plays a pivotal role in reconstructing authentic visual information from corrupted inputs, directly impacting the performance of downstream high-level vision systems. Current approaches frequently exhibit two critical limitations: (1) Progressive texture degradation and blurring during iterative refinement, particularly in irregular damage patterns. (2) Structural incoherence when handling cross-domain artifacts. To address these challenges, we present a semantic-aware hierarchical network (SAHN) that synergistically integrates multi-scale semantic guidance with structural consistency constraints. Firstly, we construct a Dual-Stream Feature Extractor. Based on a modified U-Net backbone with dilated residual blocks, this skip-connected encoder–decoder module simultaneously captures hierarchical semantic contexts and fine-grained texture details. Secondly, we propose the semantic prior mapper by establishing spatial–semantic correspondences between damaged areas and multi-scale features through predefined semantic prototypes through adaptive attention pooling. Additionally, we construct a multi-scale fusion generator, by employing cascaded association blocks with structural similarity constraints. This unit progressively aggregates features from different semantic levels using deformable convolution kernels, effectively bridging the gap between global structure and local texture reconstruction. Compared to existing methods, our algorithm attains the highest overall PSNR of 34.99 with the best visual authenticity (with the lowest FID of 11.56). Comprehensive evaluations of three datasets demonstrate its leading performance in restoring visual realism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: