Numerical simulation improves elemental logging accuracy in unconventional reservoirs, indicating enhanced gamma spectroscopy methods.
Elemental gamma spectroscopy logging while drilling is crucial for assessing element content in unconventional oil and gas reservoirs. Unlike wireline elemental spectroscopy logging, the high cross section and high-density characteristics of the drill collar can interfere with the detection of formation element content. Using numerical simulation, this paper develops a drill collar background signal removal method based on a dual detector gamma energy and time spectra combination. First, the gamma counts ratio in different time periods from the time spectra of the dual detector and the gamma energy spectra measured by the near detector are used to characterize the drill collar background. Then, the energy spectra measured by the far detector are integrated to reconstruct the pure formation gamma energy spectra. The reconstructed gamma energy spectra demonstrate that the deviation of low-content element yields can be controlled within 0.5%, indicating the accuracy of the drill collar background removal method based on dual spectra information. A numerical simulation case of elemental logging while drilling in unconventional reservoirs is constructed, and the drill collar background is removed using the time spectra and energy spectra information of the dual detector. The calculation of element and mineral contents shows that the maximum calculation errors can be controlled within 2% and 3.5%, respectively, with the calculation error for low cross section elements like Mg reduced to below 0.5%. In conclusion, the proposed drill collar signal removal method based on the time and energy domains effectively improves the accuracy of formation elemental content calculation under drilling conditions, providing theoretical guidance and technical support for elemental content evaluation and mineral analysis in unconventional oil and gas reservoirs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jilin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: