Experiments demonstrated pollutant removal of 90.4% Cr(VI) and 72.6% PNP with nZVI catalysts, indicating effective soil treatment methods.
In this work, two novel nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) composites (nanoscale zero-valent iron and copper-intercalated montmorillonite (MMT-nFe0/Cu0) and carbon microsphere-supported sulfurized nanoscale zero-valent iron (CMS@S-nFe0)) were used to treat soil contaminated with both Cr(VI) and p-nitrophenol (PNP), and added persulfate (PMS). Experiments found that the pollutant removal effect has a great relationship with the ratio of water to soil, the amount of catalyst, the amount of PMS, and the pH value. When the conditions are adjusted to the best (water–soil = 2:1, catalyst 30 g/kg, PMS 15 g/kg, pH 7–9), both materials fix Cr(VI) well and decompose PNP. The removal rates of Cr(VI) and PNP by the MMT-nFe0/Cu0 system are 90.4% and 72.6%, respectively, while the CMS@ S-nFe0 system is even more severe, reaching 94.8% and 81.3%. Soil column leaching experiments also proved that the fixation effect of Cr can last for a long time and PNP can be effectively decomposed. Through detection methods such as X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), we found that Cr(VI) was effectively reduced to Cr(III) by Fe0 and Fe2+ ions and subsequently transformed into stable FeCr2O4 spinel oxides, and the groups produced after the decomposition of PNP could also help fix the metal. This work provides a way to simultaneously treat Cr(VI) and PNP pollution, and also allows the use of multifunctional nZVI composites in complex soil environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: