Retrospective study reveals low-dose vitamin D3 raises fragility fracture risk in elderly patients, suggesting better dosing strategies.
Background/Objectives: Vitamin D deficiency contributes to pathological vertebral fragility (path-VF), including fragility fractures and early pedicle screw loosening after posterior instrumented spinal fusion (PISF). Supplementation practices remain inconsistent. This retrospective study evaluated whether patients with path-VF receive appropriate vitamin D3 (Vit.D3) supplementation and assessed the dose–response relationship between daily intake and path-VF risk, particularly in older adults. Methods: A total of 210 patients treated with kyphoplasty or PISF (2022–2023) were classified into a path-VF or control group. Daily oral Vit.D3 intake was categorised as Zero- (0 IU), Low- (<2000 IU), or High-Dose (≥2000 IU). Statistical analyses were performed for each dosage group, including subgroup analyses for patients aged ≥67.5 years. Vertebral BMD was estimated using mean Hounsfield Units (HU) from T11–L5. Results: Patients in the path-VF group received significantly lower Vit.D3 doses than controls (1431.4 ± 1055.7 vs. 2366.7 ± 1186.7 IU/day, p < 0.001). Low-dose supplementation was associated with a markedly increased risk of path-VF compared with high-dose in the overall cohort (OR = 6.5, p = 0.003) and in patients aged ≥67.5 years (OR = 8.6, p = 0.008). Logistic regression identified a threshold of 1900 IU/day (AUC = 0.805). Mean vertebral HU values were significantly lower in the path-VF group than in controls (71.9 ± 29.1 vs. 133.5 ± 52.6, p < 0.001), and no consistent HU gains were observed with increasing Vit.D3 dosage. Conclusions: Low-dose Vit.D3 supplementation was associated with increased path-VF risk, especially in patients aged >67.5 years. Patients without path-VF had received significantly higher doses, suggesting broader benefits of adequate Vit.D3 beyond bone density. A daily intake above 1900 IU may serve as a practical threshold for at-risk elderly patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: