Systematic review reveals limitations in remote treatment accessibility and data collection for eating disorders.
Overall, this body of literature remains small and characterized by limitations and inconsistencies, including differences in the treatment services evaluated as well as disparities in study design, methodology, and reporting. Utilization of remote treatment by historically excluded groups remains low, calling for further reflection around its accessibility for target communities. Additional studies with more rigorous, intentional designs are needed. The field would also benefit from standardization in relation to data collection and reporting to allow for better synthesis of findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wolfe et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: