Empirical analysis reveals carbon emissions and efficiency differences in HPC jobs, highlighting sustainable practices.
This study utilizes the PM100 dataset to quantitatively estimate job-level carbon emissions and analyze efficiency across different resource configurations. A multilayer perceptron (MLP) regression model was applied to predict emissions using execution time along with CPU, memory, and node-level power consumption data. To evaluate efficiency, we proposed the Carbon Efficiency Score (CES), which enables the classification of jobs into efficiency tiers. The analysis revealed that long-running jobs with excessive memory usage tend to exhibit low efficiency, whereas jobs with balanced resource configurations demonstrate relatively higher efficiency. CES-based classification further showed a difference of more than 200-fold between the most and least efficient jobs. Overall, this study provides a foundational framework for developing carbon-aware scheduling strategies in HPC environments and offers practical insights for the design of sustainable supercomputing operational policies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hyungwook SHIM (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: