Numerical simulation demonstrates cutting efficiency in submerged abrasive water jet, highlighting stagnation pressure effects.
To investigate the flow-field characteristics of a submerged pre-mixed abrasive water jet impinging on a wall, a physical model of the conical–cylindrical nozzle and computation domain of a submerged pre-mixed abrasive-water-jet flow field were established. Based on the software of FLUENT 2022R2, numerical simulation of the solid–liquid two-phase flow characteristics of the submerged pre-mixed abrasive water jet impinging on a wall was conducted using the DPM particle trajectory model and the realizable k–ε turbulence model. The simulation results indicate that a “water cushion layer” forms when the submerged pre-mixed abrasive water jet impinges on a wall. Tilting the nozzle appropriately facilitates the rapid dispersion of water and abrasive particles, which is beneficial for cutting. The axial-jet velocity increases rapidly in the convergent section of the nozzle, continues to accelerate over a certain distance after entering the cylindrical section, reaches its maximum value inside the nozzle, and then decelerates to a steady value before exiting the nozzle. In addition, the standoff distance has minimal impact on the flow-field characteristic inside the nozzle. When impinging on a wall surface, rapid decay of axial-jet velocity generates significant stagnation pressure. The stagnation pressure decreases with increasing standoff distance for different standoff-distance models. Considering the effects of standoff distance on jet velocity and abrasive particle dynamics, a standoff distance of 5 mm is determined to be optimal for submerged pre-mixed abrasive-water-jet pipe-cutting operations. When the submergence depth is less than 100 m, its effect on the flow-field characteristics of a submerged pre-mixed abrasive water jet impinging on a wall surface remains minimal. For underwater oil pipelines operating at depths not exceeding 100 m, the influence of submergence depth can be disregarded during cutting operations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: