Field study reveals that nest defense varies by density and predator type in Saunders's Gulls, suggesting adaptive strategies.
Nest defense is a key component of avian reproductive success, yet its intensity and expression often depend on ecological and social contexts. We investigated the nest defense behaviors of Saunders’s Gulls (Saundersilarus saundersi) breeding in Incheon Bay of South Korea in 2022 in relation to nest density and perceived threats. Using decoy presentations of three heterospecifics, Oriental Magpie (Pica serica; diurnal avian nest predator), common raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides; nocturnal mammalian nest predator), and Little Tern (Sternula albifrons; neutral co-nester), we quantified latency to respond, bombing attack rate, and the number of mobbing individuals at high- and low-density nesting sites within a breeding colony. Mixed models revealed that latency to respond and attack rates varied strongly with stimulus type, with diurnal predator magpies eliciting the fastest and most intense responses, followed by nocturnal predator raccoon dogs and co-nester terns. Nest density influenced the number of mobbing individuals, which was significantly greater at high-density sites. Principal Component Analysis reduced the three behavioral metrics into a composite score, which correlated negatively with latency and positively with bombing attack rate and mobbing intensity. This score varied with both nest density and stimulus type. Our findings demonstrate that Saunders’s Gulls adjust their nest defense strategies according to both the social context and predator type, highlighting the importance of density-dependent collective nest defense in colonial breeders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: