Cross-sectional study validates the FoC Intelligence Modelling Tool in Spanish hospitals, highlighting therapeutic relationships and patient-reported outcomes.
Background The Fundamentals of Care (FoC) Framework emphasises that care quality depends not only on clinical tasks but also on interpersonal relationships and the organisational context in which care is delivered. Although patient‐reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs and PREMs) have gained relevance in capturing these aspects, tools based on the FoC Framework remain limited in non‐English‐speaking settings. Objectives To psychometrically validate the Spanish version of the FoC Intelligence Modelling Tool (FoC‐IMT) and explore predictive relationships among the FoC dimensions: Context, Relationship and Integration of Care. Methods A cross‐sectional study was conducted with 1053 hospitalised patients in southern Spain. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA) were performed, alongside a mediation analysis using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS‐SEM) to examine directional relationships among constructs. Results EFA and CFA supported a two‐factor model—Context and Integration of Care—with excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω = 0.97). CFA showed a moderate correlation between these factors. However, PLS‐SEM mediation analysis revealed a directional model in which Context influences Relationship ( β = 0.39), which in turn predicts Integration of Care ( β = 0.89). Although embedded within Integration under CFA, the Relationship showed independent predictive power in PLS‐SEM, validating its conceptual importance. This aligns with the foundational assumption of the FoC Framework: that caregiving quality is shaped not only by tasks or procedures but by the broader environment and interpersonal relationships in which care occurs. Conclusions The Spanish FoC‐IMT Tool is a valid, reliable instrument for assessing person‐centred care. The predictive model highlights the pivotal role of therapeutic relationships in delivering integrated, high‐quality care. Patient or Public Contribution Hospitalised patients contributed directly by responding to the FoC‐IMT survey, thereby shaping the psychometric validation and predictive model. Patients were not involved in the study design, conduct or manuscript preparation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allande-Cussó et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: