Stacking method improves rock classification accuracy in small samples, suggesting effective integration of model strengths.
To address the challenges of small-sample rock fine classification—such as overfitting caused by limited sample size and the increased complexity resulting from high inter-class similarity—this study proposes a Stacking ensemble method tailored for small-sample rock image classification. Using a dataset of seven rock categories provided by the BdRace platform, 38 features were extracted across three dimensions—color, texture, and grain size—through grayscale thresholding, HSV color space analysis, gray-level co-occurrence matrix computation, and morphological analysis. The interrelationships among features were evaluated using Spearman correlation analysis and hierarchical clustering, while a voting-based fusion strategy integrated Lasso regularization, gray correlation analysis, and variance filtering for feature dimensionality reduction. The Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) was employed to perform global optimization on the base learners, including Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Naive Bayes (NBM), and Support Vector Machine (SVM), with Logistic Regression serving as the meta-classifier to construct the final Stacking ensemble model. Experimental results demonstrate that the Stacking method achieves an average classification accuracy of 85.41%, with the highest accuracy for black coal identification (97.16%). Compared to the single models RF, KNN, NBM, and SVM, it improves accuracy by 7.27%, 8.64%, 6.79%, and 6.94%, respectively. Evidently, the Stacking model integrates the strengths of individual models, significantly enhancing recognition accuracy. This research not only improves rock identification accuracy and reduces exploration costs but also advances the intelligent transformation of geological exploration, demonstrating considerable engineering application value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chao-yang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: