Retrospective study shows higher perioperative complications and ER visits in patients with prostatomegaly, suggesting need for better preoperative guidance.
Background/Objectives: While robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is the standard surgical treatment for localized prostate cancer, patients with marked prostatomegaly may experience worse outcomes. The current literature lacks generalizable, multi-surgeon data examining surgical complications in this population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2030 patients who underwent RARP at a tertiary academic referral center. Perioperative complications and oncologic outcomes were compared between patients with marked prostatomegaly (defined as a prostate volume >100 grams (g)) and those with average-sized glands (<100 g). Logistic regression was used to compare groups. Results: Patients with marked prostatomegaly had a lower PSA density (0.10 vs. 0.20, p < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in pathologic NCCN grade groups, margin status, or lymph node involvement between groups. Patients with marked prostatomegaly had 60% higher odds of experiencing perioperative complications (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.25–2.07, p < 0.0003) and were over twice as likely to have an ED visit or hospital readmission following surgery (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.79–2.61, p < 0.001). They were also 25% more likely to undergo non-nerve-sparing or unilateral nerve-sparing procedures (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.11–1.42, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Marked prostatomegaly is associated with higher rates of perioperative complications following RARP, with more frequent emergency room visits and readmissions. While nerve-sparing procedures were less commonly performed, oncologic outcomes remained comparable. Further prospective, multicenter studies are warranted to validate these results, which impact preoperative counseling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morgan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: