In-depth study reveals recursive laws linking social phenomena and energy binding mechanisms, suggesting implications for governance.
As a sister and upgraded version of Cosmic Narratology: The Innate Settings and Role Fatalism of Human Nature, this paper takes the "cross-scale recursive meta-law" as the core guiding principle, expanding the research perspective from "individual innate attributes" to "the cohesive state of social systems". Based on the "particle-human-cosmos" triple isomorphism system, this study reveals that the cohesion and evolution of social systems (family → organization → civilization) are essentially the cross-scale reuse of the formation logic of physical condensed matter. As "basic social units", human individuals emerge as ordered social cohesive states through "energy binding mechanisms" such as ideological consensus, rule contracts, and emotional bonds, and this process strictly follows the recursive logic of "dispersed basic units → binding mechanisms → ordered systems → adaptation to larger-scale laws". By defining quantitative indicators including "social binding energy", "social entropy", and "cohesive state order parameter", this paper constructs a computable model of social cohesive states; verifies the correlation between individual K/η values and social binding strength; reveals the energy threshold conditions for social phase transitions (such as organizational transformation and civilization upgrading); and extends the recursive logic to new carriers such as AI societies and extraterrestrial civilizations, proposing new propositions including "digital cohesive states" and "civilization binding levels". This research not only improves the theoretical system of cosmic narratology but also builds a quantitative bridge connecting physical laws and social phenomena, providing a new scientific perspective for understanding social evolution, optimizing organizational governance, and predicting the direction of civilization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bian Zhenfeng (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: