Research reveals that BrainEmoNet improves emotion recognition accuracy using EEG, indicating its potential for emotion assessment.
The recognition of the subject's emotional states is of great significance for achieving humanized services in many scenarios with human-computer interaction. Recently, identification of the emotional states based on electroencephalogram (EEG) has received increasing attention. However, due to the complexity of EEG signals, EEG-based emotion recognition is very challenging. In this research, a novel BrainEmoNet with learning-based framework is proposed to improve the emotion recognition accuracy from the perspective of the asymmetry of human brain functions. The BrainEmoNet consists of frequency-domain feature network (FFN), long-term dependent feature network (LDFN) and spatial characteristic analysis network (SCAN). The parallel FFN and LDFN are suggested to extract the frequency-domain and long-term dependent features of the information in each brain channel, respectively. Meanwhile, based on the working principle of the human brain, the SCAN with channel-spatial attention mechanism is proposed to focus on the high-value information channels with assigning adaptive weights and analyze the spatial characteristics of the frequency-domain and time-domain features. The feature analysis in the time-frequency-spatial perspective can fully explore the emotional information contained in EEG information. Experimental results on multi-modal DEAP dataset presents the competitive performances of the BrainEmoNet over the existing state-of-the-art models. In the subject-dependent experiments, the proposed model achieves identification accuracies of 86.77% and 82.14% in arousal and valence dimensions, respectively, compared to 75.53% and 72.83% in the subject-independent experiments. The proposed BrainEmoNet model in this research can be used as an auxiliary tool for the assessment or monitoring of emotions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: