Field experiment demonstrates no-till and residue retention improve soil fertility in waxy maize, suggesting optimal management strategies.
In the waxy maize production of Zhejiang Province, China, conventional straw management often causes planting difficulties and nutrient competition. Although no-till with straw retention is known to benefit soil structure, its long-term impacts on local soil health and productivity remain poorly understood. Hence, a six-year field experiment (2016–2021) was conducted with four treatments, i.e., no-till with residue retention (NTRR), no-till with residue removal (NTR0), plow tillage with residue incorporation (PTRR), and plow tillage with residue removal (PTR0), to investigate the long-term effects of tillage and residue management. The results demonstrated that plow tillage (PT) significantly improved soil physical properties, reducing soil compaction and decreasing bulk density compared to no-till (NT) practices. Meanwhile, residue retention (RR) enhanced soil chemical fertility, increasing soil organic matter by 7.8–9.8% and substantially improving available potassium levels. The PTRR treatment achieved the most favorable soil conditions with the lowest compaction and bulk density values among all treatments. PTRR consistently yielded the highest maize production, showing a 1.7–6.9% advantage over PTR0 and a substantial 15.4% yield increase in spring maize compared to residue removal (R0) treatments. Correlation analyses revealed significant relationships between soil quality and productivity, with the Soil Quality Index (SQI) showing strong positive correlations with both yield (r = 0.74, p < 0.01) and economic returns (r = 0.67, p < 0.05). These findings demonstrate that PTRR represents an optimal agricultural management strategy for simultaneously enhancing soil health and ensuring sustainable crop production in fresh maize cultivation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: