Analysis reveals dynamic properties of wood types for musical instruments, suggesting spruce and maple are optimal choices.
This paper explores the dynamic behavior of different wood species in the form of violin boards, based on experimental modal analysis using a single-input, multiple-output configuration. Thus, two groups of species were studied: the first group for the violin top plates, being analyzed Picea abies (spruce), Taiwania cryptomerioides Hayata (Taiwania), and Cryptomeria japonica (Japanese cedar), and the second group, with species for the back plates, such as Acer pseudoplatanus (maple), Populus nigra (poplar), Salix alba (willow), and Firmiana simplex (Chinese parasol). The results highlighted the frequency spectrum and the dominant resonance frequency, as well as the frequency damping, the signal processing analysis being based on Fast Fourier Transform and Wigner–Ville distribution of signals. The results highlighted that the lowest values of acoustic radiation are recorded for maple wood (7.8 m4 kg−1 s−1) and Taiwania (10.08 m4 kg−1 s−1), and the highest values for spruce (14.7 m4 kg−1 s−1) and Chinese parasol (15.58 m4 kg−1 s−1). Regarding the resonance frequency, the Taiwania and Japanese cedar plates present the dominant frequency around 600–635 Hz in comparison with Norway spruce having 920 Hz. The ratios between dominant frequencies of the Chinese parasol, poplar, maple, and willow are 1:1.42:2.62:2.98. It can be concluded that spruce and maple wood present the best dynamic properties, but when using other species, Japanese cedar wood for the top plate and Chinese parasol wood for the back plate represent species with potential in the construction of stringed musical instruments. Either a mechano-thermal treatment or an appropriate finish can enhance the acoustic qualities of these wood species, research that can be undertaken in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stanciu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: