Observational analysis reveals strong conversion processes in energy budgets of two-layer turbulence, indicating unique patterns in geophysical jets.
We consider the two-layer quasi-geostrophic model with linear bottom friction and, in certain simulations, a planetary vorticity gradient, β . We derive energy budgets in wavenumber space for eddy available potential energy (EAPE), baroclinic eddy kinetic energy (EKE) and barotropic EKE, a particular decomposition that has previously been overlooked. The conversion between EAPE and baroclinic EKE, T^W , has a strong dependence on both bottom drag strength and planetary β . At the deformation scale T^W is always negative, representing the conversion of EAPE to EKE via baroclinic instability. For strong, linear bottom drag, T^W is positive at large scales due to frictional energisation of the baroclinic mode, providing a large-scale EAPE source. With weak-to-moderate bottom drag and moderate-to-strong planetary β , T^W is the dominant source of EAPE at large scales, converting baroclinic EKE that has experienced a baroclinic inverse cascade back into EAPE, and thus closing a novel and exclusively baroclinic energy loop. With planetary β , zonal jets form and the dominant large-scale processes in the energy cycle of the system, e.g. barotropic dissipation and the peak of positive T^W , occur at the meridional wavenumber corresponding to the jet spacing, with no zonal wavenumber component, i.e., kₓ=0 . Importantly, the traditional source of large-scale EAPE, barotropic stirring of the baroclinic mode, is not a part of this kₓ = 0 energy cycle, and thus plays a secondary role. The results suggest that consideration of horizontally two-dimensional processes is requisite to understand the energetics and physics of baroclinic geophysical jets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthew Lobo (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: