Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis demonstrates the influence of model architecture on interpretability of diabetic retinopathy diagnostic models using fundus images.
This study focuses on the interpretability of diabetic retinopathy classification models. Seven widely used interpretability methods—Gradient, SmoothGrad, Integrated Gradients, SHAP, DeepLIFT, Grad-CAM++, and ScoreCAM—are applied to assess the interpretability of four representative deep learning architectures, VGG, ResNet, DenseNet, and EfficientNet, on fundus images. Through saliency map visualization, perturbation curve analysis, and trend correlation analysis, combined with four quantitative metrics—saliency map entropy, AOPC score, Recall, and Dice coefficient—the interpretability performance of the models is comprehensively assessed from both qualitative and quantitative perspectives. The results show that model architecture greatly influences interpretability quality: models with simpler structures and clearer feature extraction paths (such as VGG) perform better in terms of interpretability, while deeper or lightweight architectures exhibit certain limitations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: