Analysis reveals Richardson extrapolation flaws in estimating accuracy, suggesting alternative asymptotic approaches.
We consider the fundamental problem of estimating the difference between the exact value and approximations that depend on a single real parameter . It is well‐known that if the error satisfies an asymptotic expansion, then we can use Richardson extrapolation to approximate . In this paper, our primary concern is the accuracy of Richardson's error estimate , that is, the size of the relative error . In practice, the computed value is different from the exact value . We show how to determine when the computational error is irrelevant and how to estimate the accuracy of Richardson's error estimate in terms of Richardson's fraction . We establish monotone convergence theorems and derive upper and lower bounds for in terms of and . We classify asymptotic error expansions according to their practical value rather than the order of the primary error term. We present a sequence of numerical experiments that illustrate the theory. Weierstrass's function is used to define a sequence of smooth problems for which it is impractical to apply Richardson's techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mikkelsen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: