Longitudinal studies reveal well-being influences values in distinct populations, suggesting important context effects.
Theories and research on the relationships between values and well-being have predominantly focused on how values may affect well-being, with less attention to the reverse direction—how well-being may shape values. We present three alternative theoretical perspectives on this latter direction: well-being as an activator, reinforcer, and operator of value change. Using diverse measures of well-being and personal values, we conducted three longitudinal studies centered on the same life transition—entering university—across distinct samples from Mainland China ( N = 218), Hong Kong ( N = 252), and the United Kingdom ( N = 196). Results from parallel process latent growth models (LGMs) showed more substantial evidence for well-being predicting later value change than the reverse. Specifically, well-being predicted later value changes in three cases: Initial life satisfaction predicted increases in the openness to change value dimension in Study 1, and initial self-esteem predicted increases in both openness to change and self-enhancement value dimensions in Study 3. Values predicted later well-being changes only once: Initial self-enhancement value dimension predicted increases in positive affect in Study 2. These results illuminate the intricate nature of the relationships between well-being and values, highlighting well-being’s role as a catalyst for value development and the importance of contextual factors during life transitions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ye et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: