This bibliometric overview reveals growth in deep learning applications for ultrasound imaging, indicating advances in classification and segmentation methods.
Background Deep learning (DL) has enabled advances in ultrasound imaging, but challenges like limited datasets and device variability hinder progress. This study provides the first bibliometric overview of DL research in medical ultrasound. Method We retrieved related publications (2004–Apr 2025) on medical ultrasound and DL from the Web of Science Core Collection. Bibliometric tools (Bibliometrix, VOSviewer, CiteSpace) were used to quantify publication growth, country/institution contributions, and thematic evolution. Results A total of 3386 publications were included, with the annual output increasing steadily at an average growth rate of 31.02%. While China led all countries in publication volume (1355), the United Kingdom achieved the highest citation rate per article (55.5 citations). Fudan University was the most prolific institution (110), and key authors such as Luca Saba and Jasjit S. Suri formed the principal collaboration hubs. In terms of venues, Diagnostics published the most papers, whereas IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging exerted the greatest citation impact (5646 citations; IF 8.9). Keyword analysis revealed core themes in classification, segmentation, and CNN‐based diagnosis. From 2020 onward, ultrasound‐specific topics (e.g., diagnosis, images) dominate; advanced architectures (e.g., U‐Net) and emerging clinical concepts such as noninvasive assessment. Conclusion This mapping highlights a rapidly growing, internationally collaborative field. Emerging trends include advanced artificial intelligence (AI) architectures (U‐Net, attention‐based networks, vision Transformers) and a shift toward surgical and therapeutic applications. These insights underscore the need for multicenter validation, standardized data protocols, and clinically interpretable AI models to accelerate safe translation into practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: