Analysis reveals no violations of the ACS constraint on infrared degrees of freedom in gauge theories, highlighting the role of the superpotential.
We revisit the constraint proposed by T. Appelquist, A. G. Cohen, and M. Schmaltz (ACS) on asymptotically free field theories, which relates the number of infrared (IR) degrees of freedom to those in the ultraviolet (UV). The original ACS analysis examined several examples—both supersymmetric and non-supersymmetric—and identified only one interacting IR fixed point with a superpotential: Seiberg dual of an SU(Nc) gauge theory. Here, we extend their analysis to SO(Nc) and Sp(2Nc) gauge groups near Banks–Zaks fixed points. We further test the ACS inequality in theories featuring conjectured accidental IR symmetries and nontrivial superpotential deformations. Beginning with ADE-type deformations, we then investigate three chiral theories by estimating decoupled chiral-ring invariants using a-maximization and unitarity bounds. In all cases, we find no violation of the ACS conjecture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yair Mulian (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: