This study demonstrates functional divergence of zebrafish sox paralogues in endoderm specification, indicating unique roles for transcription factors in organ development.
Endoderm, one of three primary germ layers of vertebrate embryos, makes major contributions to the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts and associated organs, including liver and pancreas. In mammals, transcription factor SOX17 is vital for endoderm organ formation and can induce endoderm progenitor identity. Duplication of ancestral sox17 before or during early evolution of ray-finned fishes produced paralogues sox32 and sox17 in zebrafish. Sox32 is required for specification of endoderm and progenitors of the left-right organiser (Kupffer’s Vesicle, KV), with Sox17 a downstream target of Sox32 implicated in further KV development. Phenotypic evidence therefore suggests functional similarities between zebrafish Sox32 and Sox17 and mammalian SOX17. Here, we directly compare these orthologues and paralogues, using the early zebrafish embryo as a biological platform for functional testing. Our results indicate that, unlike Sox32, human SOX17 cannot induce endoderm specification in zebrafish. Furthermore, using hybrid protein functional analyses, we show Sox32 specificity for the endoderm gene regulatory network is linked to evolutionary divergence in its DNA-binding HMG domain from its paralogue Sox17. Additionally, changes in C-terminal regions of Sox32 and Sox17 underpin their differing target specificities. Finally, we establish that specific conserved peptides in the Sox17 C-terminal domain are essential for its role in establishing correct organ asymmetry. Overall, our results illuminate the molecular basis for functional divergence of Sox32 and Sox17 in vertebrate endoderm development and left-right patterning, and reveal that alternations in specific domains of both transcription factors at different points during evolution of fish is critical to their distinct and essential functions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johal et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: