Longitudinal study shows lower haemoglobin increases cardiovascular events in chronic kidney disease, particularly in women.
Background and Hypothesis Standard approach to anaemia in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) does not account for potential age- or sex-specific related risks. We assessed differences in the association between haemoglobin and major cardiovascular events (MACE+) in men and women with CKD, by age groups. Methods Using 5-year longitudinal data from the CKD-REIN cohort, we studied patients with CKD stage 2–5 not treated with erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA). The main outcome was MACE+, defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or hospitalization for acute heart failure. Competing events were initiation of kidney replacement therapy and non-cardiovascular death. In each of the 4 predefined subgroups by sex and age (≤ 70 versus > 70 years at baseline), we estimated hazard ratios (HR) of current values of haemoglobin using a cause-specific Cox model adjusted for current values of glomerular filtration rate and transferrin saturation. All current values of biomarkers were first estimated in a multivariate-shared random effect joint model. Results Analyses considered 29 042 haemoglobin measurements from 2791 patients, and 364 MACE + . The association between current haemoglobin and log hazard of MACE + was linear in men and J-shape in women. For a haemoglobin of 10.5 g/dL, as compared to 11.5 g/dL, the hazard of MACE + at any time was increased by 60% in younger women (HR = 1.6, 95%CI 1.1–2.4), 70% in older women (HR = 1.7, 95%CI 1.3–2.4), 30% in younger men (HR = 1.3 95%CI 1.1–1.5) and 20% in older men (HR = 1.2 95%CI 1.1–1.4). Results were similar in the sensitivity analysis not censoring at the first ESA treatment. Conclusion Our longitudinal analysis in patients with CKD not on ESA therapy highlights a stronger association between anaemia and increased hazard of MACE + in women than in men. This sex-difference should inform the design of trials addressing anaemia correction in CKD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gall et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: