Mixed-design experiment shows non-driving tasks reduce visual attention and affect obstacle avoidance in autonomous vehicles.
Current autonomous vehicles require human drivers to take over control during emergencies or in environments the system cannot handle. During other periods, drivers are permitted to engage in non-driving-related tasks. It is essential to investigate how the immersion in non-driving-related tasks affects drivers’ takeover performance under different scenarios. To address this, a mixed-design simulated driving experiment was conducted with 40 participants, incorporating three non-driving-related tasks (no task, watch video, play game), three takeover request lead times (3 s, 5 s, 7 s), and two obstacle types (dynamic, static). The takeover process was divided into three phases: preparation, obstacle avoidance, and recovery. Analysis of the areas of interest showed that engaging in non-driving-related tasks substantially reduced drivers’ visual attention tothe road ahead during the preparation phase. The Generalized Estimating Equations method was employed to investigate the effects of various factors on takeover performance. Model results showed that scenarios with static obstacles and longer takeover request times led to a significant reduction in mean lane deviation but a significant increase in the standard deviation of lane deviation, suggesting improved lateral control performance. A significant interaction was observed between the watch video task and static obstacles, which corresponded to a notable decrease in the mean vehicle speed during obstacle avoidance. Performance in the recovery phase was strongly predicted by that in the obstacle avoidance phase, indicating that the stability of the avoidance maneuver is a critical determinant of the subsequent recovery. These findings offer valuable insights for managing non-driving-related tasks and setting appropriate takeover request timings in automated driving systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: