This analysis reveals the impact of supplier selection on sustainability outcomes in UAV industries, indicating significant benefits of expert decision-making under uncertainty.
Global brands are increasingly establishing dedicated administrative departments to strengthen sustainability and resilience in their supply chains. However, overlooking these aspects at the supplier level can result in significant costs and systemic vulnerabilities. This study addresses this gap through four key contributions: First, we provide a comprehensive sustainability assessment by simultaneously considering economic, environmental, and social pillars along with resilience, operationalized through twenty-four sub-criteria. Second, we explicitly incorporate human judgment and uncertainty by modeling supplier evaluation with interval weights, capturing the ambiguity and subjectivity inherent in expert decision-making. Third, we propose a novel hybrid methodology, integrating lexicographic goal programming (LGP), the analytical hierarchy process (AHP), and two-stage logarithmic goal programming (TLGP) in a systematic framework. Finally, we validate the approach in real-world contexts through case studies in the electronics and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) industries. The results reveal notable differences in supplier rankings when comparing LGP and TLGP, highlighting the methodological implications of advanced goal programming in uncertain environments. Overall, this study advances supplier selection research by offering both a validated decision-support tool for practitioners and methodological insights for scholars working on sustainability and resilience under uncertainty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Babadi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: