Prospective interventional study evaluates combined vitrectomy technique for visual benefits in submacular hemorrhage patients.
Purpose: To introduce a vitrectomy technique for the submacular hemorrhage (SMH) combined with subretinal tenecteplase (TNK-tPA) injection, intravitreal conbercept administration, perfluoropropane (C3F8) gas tamponade, and to evaluate its efficacy and safety. Methods: In this single-center, prospective, interventional study, patients underwent 25-gauge vitrectomy with subretinal TNK-tPA and intravitreal conbercept injection, followed by 0.5-1.0 mL of pure C3F8 gas tamponade. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were assessed at baseline, and 1, 3, and 6 months post-operatively. Favorable outcome was defined as a BCVA ≤0.5 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (log MAR) at 6 months Results: Twenty eyes of 20 patients with treatment-naïve spontaneous SMH (≤30 days) secondary to polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (70%) or retinal arterial macroaneurysms (30%) were included. Mean CRT significantly decreased from 887.1±52.2μm to 276.7±83.8μm (P < 0.001) at 6 months. Notably, 75% of the treated eyes (13 out of 20) achieved a favorable outcome (BCVA ≤0.5 log MAR; Snellen equivalent ≈20/63). Pearson’s correlation analysis revealed that the SMH onset-vitrectomy interval (SOVI) was significantly negatively correlated with a favorable outcome (r = -0.452, P = 0.045). After adjusting for potential interaction effect, the SOVI remained a statistically significant predictor of worse log MAR BCVA (odds ratio [OR] = 1.023, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.013-1.034, P < 0.001). Conclusions: The present technique for treatment-naïve spontaneous SMH, in combination with subretinal TNK-tPA injection, intravitreal conbercept administration, and C3F8 gas tamponade, demonstrated potential for visual improvement in eyes treated within 30 days of SMH onset.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: