Phase 1 trial evaluates safety and maximum tolerated dose of regorafenib with temozolomide in glioblastoma, indicating potential treatment benefits.
BACKGROUND Regorafenib (REG) is an oral multikinase inhibitor that has shown synergistic antitumor effects with radiotherapy and temozolomide (TMZ) in glioblastoma. This phase 1 study evaluated the safety, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary activity of REG in combination with standard GBM treatment. METHODS Using a 3 + 3 design, this multicenter study assessed REG at doses of 80mg, 120mg, and 160mg in patients with MGMT-methylated, IDH wild-type GBM (WHO2021) and ECOG PS 0-1. -Cohort A: REG+maintenance TMZ after standard chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) -Cohort B: REG concurrently with CT-RT, continued with TMZ. REG was given 3 weeks on/1 off. DLTs were monitored during the first two maintenance cycles (cohort A) and during CT-RT (cohort B). Toxicity was assessed using CTCAEv5.0, and tumor response by RANO criteria. PK was also evaluated. RESULTS In cohort A (n=9), no DLTs occurred. One patient each at Levels 1 and 2 had grade 3 (G3) hematologic toxicity; at Level 3, one had G3 gastrointestinal toxicity. In cohort B (n=12), two DLTs occurred at Level 3: G3 hypertransaminasemia and G4 thrombocytopenia. Additional G3 toxicities included hypertension, hyperbilirubinemia, and hypertransaminasemia. No grade≥3 AEs occurred at Level 1. PK analysis of REG showed a significant reduction (p=0.038) in the AUC, with a geometric mean ratio of 80% (CI9064–98%) when given with TMZ. PK analysis of TMZ showed a slight but significant reduction in the Cmax and AUC (p=0.003 and 0.015, respectively) when given with REG. This suggest a weak PK interaction. CONCLUSION The MTD of REG for cohort A was 160mg, and for cohort B 120mg with a weak PK interaction between the two drugs. The MTD of 120mg can be considered the recommended dose of REG in combination with standard Stupp therapy for the phase 2 study. Preliminary activity analyses are ongoing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Padovan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: