Retrospective analysis demonstrates efficacy and safety of radiotherapy in pediatric CNS malignancies, suggesting viable salvage option.
BACKGROUND Few studies have investigated the safety and outcome of re-irradiation with craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Our study aims to characterize clinical outcomes, including toxicity, and correlate outcomes with dosimetric parameters after photon re-irradiation with CSI. METHODS This single-institution retrospective study was approved by the IRB. Inclusion criteria included <21 years at diagnosis, definitive RT at initial diagnosis, and CSI as part of treatment at relapse or secondary malignancy from 2013-2025. Patients with <1 month of follow-up were excluded. Clinical and treatment characteristics were recorded. Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Toxicities were graded using CTCAE v5. RESULTS Of the 9 patients in the cohort, 5 (55.6%) were female. Median age at diagnosis was 4.6 years (range: 0.2-17.0). The most common histology was medulloblastoma (n=3). At diagnosis, 6 patients received CSI and 3 received focal RT. Median dose of first RT was 54 Gy (range: 21.6-59.4) and 8 patients received proton RT at diagnosis. Median time to first relapse was 15.9 months (range: 2.3-94.0). Location of first recurrence was brain (n=5), spine (n=1), or both brain and spine (n=3). Six patients received chemotherapy and five received additional radiotherapy before re-irradiation with CSI. All patients had progression noted ≥2 times radiographically prior to salvage CSI. Median dose of salvage CSI was 24 Gy (range: 18.0-30.6) and median dose to any boost volume was 30 Gy (range: 25-36 Gy). Median follow-up was 7.0 months (range: 2.2-92.4 months), and PFS and OS at 6 months were 55.6% and 77.8%, respectively. No grade ≥2 CNS toxicity was observed. Five patients experienced grade ≥3 acute hematologic toxicity. CONCLUSIONS Re-irradiation with CSI can be a safe option and provide local control; median follow-up time remains short and cumulative doses to critical organs at risk remain important considerations for this approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: