Retrospective cohort analysis shows reirradiation enhances progression-free survival in recurrent glioblastoma, indicating potential treatment benefits.
PURPOSE The management of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) remains a clinical challenge, with only limited therapeutic options available to date. Reirradiation may offer a progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in selected cases, but data are scarce. METHODS Consecutive patients from the last 10 years with GBM (CNS WHO grade 4, IDH-wildtype) who underwent at least one additional course of cranial radiotherapy for suspected or histopathologically confirmed rGBM at a tertiary neuro-oncological center were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was PFS, secondary endpoints included reirradiation-related adverse event rates, with a particular focus on radiation necrosis (RN). RESULTS Fifty-nine patients were included with a median follow-up (range) of 8.7 (0.5–48.0) months after reirradiation. The median time to first recurrence was 15 (4–89) months, with the majority occurring in-field (59.7%). The EQD2α/β=10 ranged from 31.3–80.2 Gy with a median prescription dose of 42 Gy. Reirradiation was combined with systemic therapy in 81.4% of patients. No grade 3–5 acute reirradiation-related adverse events were observed. RN was diagnosed in 16.9% of patients (80% grade 2 and 20% grade 3), with a notably low rate in those receiving anti-VEGF therapy parallel to reirradiation. RN risk was independent of reirradiation volume or dose (p = 0.15 and 0.43, respectively). The disease control rate following reirradiation was 83.6% and the median PFS was 5.9 (0.5–48.0) months. Concomitant chemotherapy or anti-VEGF therapy was significantly associated with improved outcomes (p = 0.049), whereas smaller reirradiation volumes demonstrated a non-significant trend towards longer PFS (p = 0.23). CONCLUSION In this retrospective analysis, reirradiation for rGBM was feasible and safe, conferring a potential PFS benefit in selected patients. Bevacizumab emerged as a particularly promising combination partner, contributing to both RN prevention and enhanced efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dejonckheere et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: