Observational study reveals clinicopathological factors linked to tumor progression in non-functioning pituitary adenomas, indicating needs for monitoring and treatment adjustments.
For asymptomatic non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs), conservative management such as observation is generally preferred. However, a subset of NFPAs demonstrates poor prognoses. This study aimed to identify clinicopathological characteristics associated with unfavorable outcomes. A total of 125 patients with NFPAs who underwent surgery between November 2017 and December 2022 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical, radiological, and pathological data, including hormone profiles, tumor size, presence of cavernous sinus invasion, and Ki-67 index levels, were reviewed. High-risk PAs were identified according to 2022 WHO criteria. Statistical analyses including Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox regression were performed to evaluate factors associated with tumor progression or recurrence. A high-risk group demonstrated a significantly higher rate of tumor progression/recurrence than a low-risk group (p-value = 0.004). In multivariate analysis, the high-risk group at the time of diagnosis remained as an independent prognostic factor for NFPAs (p-value = 0.0148). The high-risk group also had a higher percentage of younger patients (80.0% in the high-risk group vs. 62.2% in the low-risk group, p-value = 0.016) and female patients (91.4% vs. 34.4%, p< 0.001). The presence of cavernous sinus invasion and higher Ki-67 index levels were more commonly observed in the high-risk group, although these factors did not significantly impact the overall prognosis. Our findings indicate that patients with high-risk NFPAs have a more aggressive disease course and a higher rate of progression or recurrence. This high-risk group has higher prevalence of younger and female patients. They may benefit from closer monitoring and possibly more aggressive treatment approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: