Long-term treatment with DS-1001b improves tumor growth outcomes in IDH1-mutant gliomas, suggesting significant epigenetic and metabolic shifts.
BACKGROUND Heterozygous mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 and 2 represent defining molecular alterations in astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, and oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant, as classified by the World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System, 5th Edition. These mutations result in neomorphic enzymatic activity that converts α-ketoglutarate to the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), leading to widespread epigenetic dysregulation. In this study, we assessed the therapeutic potential of DS-1001b, a selective inhibitor of mutant IDH1 (R132H and R132C), using IDH1 R132H-mutant glioma cell lines and xenograft models. METHODS We examined the growth-inhibitory effects of DS-1001b in vitro and in vivo using three IDH1 R132H-mutant glioma models: MGG152, BT142, and A1074. The impact of long-term DS-1001b exposure on transcriptional programs, epigenetic landscape, and cellular metabolism was also analyzed through RNA-seq, ChIP-seq, DNA methylation profiling, and metabolomic assays. RESULTS DS-1001b treatment markedly suppressed 2-HG production in both cultured glioma cells and xenograft tumors. In intracranial models derived from A1074 and BT142, DS-1001b significantly extended survival (p = 0.0064 and p = 0.0004, respectively). Prolonged treatment (6 months) partially reversed global DNA hypermethylation patterns. Integrated analyses of RNA sequencing, ChIP sequencing, and DNA methylation data revealed that DS-1001b-induced changes in H3K4me3 enrichment were closely associated with alterations in gene expression. Furthermore, metabolomic profiling indicated a significant reduction in asparagine levels in A1074 cells after prolonged DS-1001b administration. CONCLUSIONS These findings demonstrated that sustained inhibition of mutant IDH1 with DS-1001b exerted antitumor effects in IDH1-mutant gliomas both in vitro and in vivo, accompanied by changes in transcriptomic and epigenetic profiles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fujimoto et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: