Comparison reveals printed polymethyl methacrylate dental devices show less wear than milled and heat-polymerized materials.
Significant differences in wear were found among printed, milled, and heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate occlusal device materials. The wear of these materials was influenced by both the type of material used and the antagonist materials. The printed occlusal device material exhibited the least amount of wear.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arreaza et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: