Research reveals that eye movements affect language processing and reading comprehension, indicating the role of expectancy.
This study investigates how expectancy and plausibility influence behavioral and neural measures of language processing during naturalistic reading comprehension. Prior event‐related potential (ERP) studies show evidence of distinct post‐N400 positivities to violations of semantic expectancy and plausibility using artificial serial presentation but have yet to establish these phenomena during naturalistic reading. Therefore, we recorded simultaneous eye movements and EEG while participants read highly constraining sentences with expected, unexpected (but plausible), and anomalous target words. Time locked to the pre‐target word, we observed a contextually graded parafoveal N400 effect. The N400 was facilitated (i.e., reduced) when the word was subsequently fixated, suggesting trans‐saccadic integration of semantic features. At target fixation, we also observed a late anteriorly distributed positivity to unexpected target words and a posteriorly distributed positivity to anomalous target words, effects that were not clearly present when time locked to the pre‐target word. Eye‐tracking (ET) measures show that readers were sensitive to both expectancy and plausibility at target fixation. In conclusion, we show that readers can begin accessing semantic information in parafoveal vision, but higher‐level semantic processing may require the orchestration of both parafoveal and foveal representations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Copeland et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: