Functional connectivity assessments reveal brain tumors impact dexterity, suggesting surgical planning insights.
Purpose The purpose of this study was to explore different brain network connectomic relationships subserving hand dexterity in patients with contrast‐enhancing brain tumors during task and resting states. Method We measured hand dexterity, resting state functional connectivity, and task‐based functional connectivity in 21 participants with newly diagnosed brain tumors. Hand dexterity was measured using the 9‐hole peg test (9HPT), and patient‐reported outcomes were assessed with the Duroz Hand Index (DHI). Findings We discovered the following: (1) The inability to complete dexterous tasks is most associated with low somatomotor‐basal ganglia network connectivity during rest but high somatomotor‐basal ganglia network connectivity during tasks; (2) in the subgroup of better dexterous performers, resting somatomotor‐salience connectivity is higher in people with poor dexterity—a relationship that holds true in healthy adult subjects from the Human Connectome Project (HCP), suggesting it has fundamental importance; and (3) connectomic measurements were stronger predictors of dexterous performance than classical variables of tumor (i.e., size, grade, or anatomical location). Conclusions These data suggest that connectomic correlates of dexterity are different in resting and task‐based states. Additionally, our data suggest a threshold level of somatomotor‐to‐basal ganglia connectivity is required to accomplish dexterous movements, and, in the cases of appropriately preserved somatomotor‐to‐basal ganglia connectivity, salience‐somatomotor connectivity then becomes the dominant connection facilitating performance in a hierarchical fashion. These findings have fundamental implications for both surgical planning and neuromodulation‐based rehabilitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boerger et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: