Analysis demonstrates enantioselective antimicrobial effects in α- and β-pinene with essential oils, suggesting implications for therapeutic use.
This study investigated the stereoselective antimicrobial, anti-quorum sensing, and toxicity profiles of the enantiomers of α- and β-pinene, individually and in 1:1 combinations with 14 essential oil compounds. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays revealed comparable activity between the α- and β-pinene enantiomers (0.25-4.00 mg/mL) when tested independently, but notable enantioselective differences in combination. S-(-)-α-pinene showed greater synergistic interactions with β-caryophyllene, estragole, and ocimene against Staphylococcus aureus (ΣFIC = 0.50), whereas R-(+)-β-pinene was synergistic with isoeugenol against Cryptococcus neoformans (ΣFIC = 0.50). Anti-quorum sensing assays using Chromobacterium violaceum demonstrated stronger inhibition by R-(+)-α-pinene (MQSIC = 0.38 ± 0.18 mg/mL; 67.02 % violacein inhibition at 0.50 mg/mL) and R-(+)-β-pinene (MQSIC = 0.50 mg/mL; 57.32 %) compared with their S-(-) counterparts (> 0.50 mg/mL; 30.72 % and 22.78 %, respectively). The most pronounced stereochemical variation was observed in combinations with γ-terpinene and ocimene (> 20 % difference in violacein inhibition). Brine shrimp lethality assays showed both α-pinene enantiomers to be non-toxic, while S-(-)-β-pinene exhibited greater toxicity (90.82 % mortality) than R-(+)-β-pinene (30.75 %) after 48 h. These findings highlight the important role of stereochemistry in determining the bio-activity and safety of α- and β-pinene, highlighting the therapeutic importance of chirality in the research of essential oil compounds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoosen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: