Meta-analysis reveals comparative diagnostic accuracy for PJI between mNGS and tNGS, highlighting different strengths.
This meta-analysis indicates that mNGS demonstrates higher sensitivity and a numerically greater AUC than tNGS for diagnosing PJI, with acceptable specificity, although the difference in AUC was not statistically significant. Conversely, tNGS exhibits higher specificity and DOR, alongside acceptable sensitivity, making it valuable for confirming PJI. Overall, the diagnostic accuracy of both next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods is comparable, with each possessing distinct advantages and limitations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: