Qualitative interviews highlight barriers to collecting sexual orientation and gender identity data in oncology, suggesting systemic change is needed.
Importance Sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data are vital, but inconsistently collected among cancer centers. Objective This study aims to identify themes from a large set of interviews regarding the collection of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data in oncology practice. Setting Oncology care settings in diverse geopolitical regions in the United States. Participants Sixty‐two semi‐structured interviews across 23 cancer centers in the United States were conducted from September 1, 2022 to August 31, 2023. Interview transcripts were transcribed and double‐coded using thematic analysis and emergent coding. Main Outcomes and Measures We used inductive, open coding thematic qualitative analysis with no predetermined constructs. Results Key themes included: (1) barriers to SOGI data collection include stigma and bias, generational and geopolitical resistance, fragmented workflows, competing priorities and institutional inertia; (2) the importance of staff exposure to lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, and intersex (LGBTQI) individuals in understanding SOGI's clinical relevance; and (3) structural challenges to equitable care for transgender patients, including electronic health record (EHR) limitations and billing issues. Taken together, these findings reveal a complex interplay of sociocultural, institutional, and systemic barriers that impede routine SOGI data collection in cancer care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gold et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: