Clinical trial shows treatment improves progression free survival and immune response in prostate cancer, indicating potential for enhanced efficacy through combinatorial approaches.
Description We have previously shown in murine tumor models that PD-L1 blockade improves anti-tumor vaccine efficacy. In 66 patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer, we reported that concurrent, but not sequential, treatment with DNA vaccine encoding prostatic acid phosphatase (pTVG-HP) and PD-1 blockade resulted in PSA declines in 35% (>50% declines in 10%) patients, reductions in tumor volumes, and 47.2% six-month progression free survival (PFS) rate [NCT02499835]. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) correlated with prolonged stable disease or PSA declines. Tumor biopsies obtained pre- and post-treatment from the same metastatic sites of 12 patients were analyzed using Nanostring nCounter and GeoMx platforms. Responders (PSA ↓ >50% or PFS > 6 months) showed increased antigen presentation and T cell activation related marker expression, dendritic cell infiltration and reduced checkpoint marker expression. Non-responders exhibited immune-suppressive pathways, including higher expression of immune checkpoints and myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC)-associated markers. Increased PARP expression in non-responders and in patients w/o irAEs suggested a potential resistance mechanism. These findings emphasize the role of tumor-infiltrating antigen presenting cells and T cell activation in therapeutic response to vaccine + PD-1 blockade and suggest that further combination with PARP inhibition or treatments targeting MDSC might increase treatment efficacy. Funding Sources Grant support was provided by NIH (P30 CA014520 and R01 CA129154), a 2014 Movember-PCF Challenge Award from the Prostate Cancer Foundation, and with funding support by Madison Vaccines, Inc.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rastogi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: