Imaging demonstrates that fluorescein sodium improves central corneal thickness in dry eye disease, suggesting enhanced detection of corneal defects.
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of topical fluorescein on Scheimpflug-based corneal densitometry and to determine the optimal timing for reliable imaging. In addition, a patient with dry eye disease (DED) was examined to assess the potential of fluorescein-enhanced densitometry for detecting superficial punctate keratitis (SPK). Methods: Twenty healthy participants underwent Scheimpflug imaging at baseline and 1-, 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-minute postinstillation of 2% fluorescein sodium. Corneal densitometry values across 3 corneal layers and 4 concentric zones and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured. Imaging was repeated at a second visit to assess reproducibility. A linear mixed-effects model was used to analyze time-dependent changes. One patient with DED with SPK was included for a proof-of-concept examination. Results: A significant increase in corneal densitometry after fluorescein instillation was only observed in the anterior layer, with an increase in the 0- to 2-mm zone at visit 1 from 26.6 ± 2.4 gray scale units (GSU) to 62.5 ± 18.9 GSU ( P < 0.001) at 5-minute postinstillation and a gradual decrease toward baseline values by 20 minutes (32.0 ± 11.4 GSU, P = 0.045). Reproducibility between visits was high for 10- to 20-minute postinstillation examinations ( P > 0.05). In the patient with DED, fluorescein-enhanced densitometry revealed localized signal elevations consistent with SPK seen on slit-lamp examination. Conclusions: Topical fluorescein induces time-dependent changes in anterior corneal densitometry, with measurements returning close to baseline by 20-minute postinstillation in healthy eyes. In patients with DED, fluorescein may locally enhance densitometry of epithelial defects and could offer a novel, objective method for assessing corneal surface integrity. Further studies are needed to validate its clinical utility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sadeghi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: