Analysis reveals that thicker sediment layers increase energy consumption in metal pipelines, suggesting maintenance is crucial.
A specific example shows the calculation of the maximum allowable thickness of the layer of internal sediments in metal pipes of engineering systems from a hydraulic point of view, which affects the values of the characteristics of their hydraulic potential and the actual energy consumption of pumping units transporting water or heat to consumers. Graphs of dependencies are presented, demonstrating a significant discrepancy between the magnitude of the hydraulic slope and the energy consumption of pumps in new and worn-out metal pipelines of water supply and heat supply systems. The subject of the study is the definition of a quantitative criterion for assessing the limiting condition of metal pipelines of engineering networks (water supply and heat supply). Such a criterion is the maximum allowable thickness of the layer of internal deposits on the walls of metal pipelines, if exceeded, their further operation becomes impractical. Materials and methods: The methodology is based on analytical dependencies for the hydraulic calculation of pipelines based on the formulas of Professor F.A. Shevelev, clarified by the authors taking into account the reduction in the live section of the pipe due to deposits. The method includes the calculation of the actual internal diameter, flow velocity, hydraulic slope and energy consumption of pumping units depending on the thickness of the sediment layer (δ). Results: A concrete example shows that with the thickness of deposits in a steel pipe, the hydraulic slope increases, and the energy consumption of pumps increases compared to a new pipeline. The maximum allowable thickness of the sediment layer is calculated, after which operation becomes ineffective. Conclusions: Based on the results, it is concluded that it is necessary to monitor the thickness of internal deposits to justify the decommissioning of networks. The authors recommend developing a scale of maximum allowable thicknesses for the entire range of pipes and making appropriate requirements in updated versions of codes of rules for outdoor networks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prodous et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: